• The Good, the Bad and the Ugly |
Political 2016-06-14 |
"It was Hillary's turn. Somewhere, a few wise men had decided this. The only problem was a logistical one. It was the perennial dilemma of legitimizing and celebrating this choice with a staged plebiscite... Therefore a year-long circus would have to be designed to turn a mirage into reality... The challenge was to get a satisfactory turnout of the voters, persuade them that their votes matter, and make them forget that the choice was predetermined... It also seemed enticing to cast three main characters in our spaghetti-election triptych, where 'the good, the bad, and the ugly' would be at odds with one another, and 'the bad' would metamorphose into the pragmatic and reluctant warrior. Diana the Huntress (Clinton) would slay the limp Leftist Firebrand (Sanders), and subsequently become the lesser of the two evils in apposition to the hateful Ugly American (Trump)...
Diana the Huntress...has already proven her ruthlessness and ability to kill the innocent. This makes the [unthinking] voters feel safe. They understand that she is “fighting for us” and can pull the trigger...[and] unlike Lady Macbeth, her bloodstained hands do not trouble her... The destabilizations of Venezuela, Russia, Brazil, Iran, and China, which are already in the works economically, would rise to the top of the agenda... The Greater Israel Project would continue unabated. Drones would darken the skies like the pterodactyls of the Empire..."
Unfortunately, the "greater Israel project" will continue no matter which of the three puppets is installed, and American taxpayers will be forced to pay for it. Benjamin Netanyahu, who was endorsed by Donald Trump, is now demanding over $40,000,000,000 (40 billion dollars) to support the Jewish State. It doesn't get much uglier than that.