Much speculation has been swirling around regarding the recent Las Vegas shooting incident. Who was the alleged gunman, Stephen Paddock? What connections did he have? How many other accomplices were involved? Why did the police take so long to break into his hotel room? Why haven't the hotel and casino surveillance videos been shown to the public? Why would a "lone nut" need 23 semi-automatic weapons, instead of just swapping clips on the one or two needed to carry out the attack? Why do photos of the alleged "sniper nest" on the 32nd floor show only a handful of shell casings instead of the thousands that should have been there?

Paddock allegedly fired 200 rounds at a hotel security guard, at point-blank range, and only managed to hit him in the leg. This 64 year old retiree with no military experience then turned around and, we are told, hit some 500 other moving targets from nearly 1000 feet away using a hand-held weapon in less than 10 minutes. Seems incredible, doesn't it? Like something out of a twisted MGM movie. Note that both the Luxor and the Mandalay Bay hotels are owned by MGM.

The FBI and the corporate media would like for us to simply swallow the "official story", without any sort of actual forensic investigation. Just another crazed gun nut who acted alone, case closed. Typical media hype and emotional garbage with no actual analysis, combined with political demands to increase surveillance and disarm the law-abiding public, etc. Meanwhile, bloggers have followed every rabbit trail like baying hounds, jumping to wild conclusions based on the limited and contradictory "facts" that have been provided. All part of the diversion and cover-up which is standard after every such event.

Some have suggested that Paddock may have been an undercover agent for the government, working on a "sting" operation gone bad. In this scenario, the "clients" got wise to the setup, killed Paddock, carried out the attack on the concert venue, and escaped during the confusion, leaving Paddock as the "fall guy":

"While Stephen Paddock’s intelligence bosses were eager to put marked guns in the hands of jihadist supporters in America, ISIS [sic] was many steps ahead of the intel bureaucrats... If the killings at the Orlando Pulse* were an initial taste of glory, the assault on Las Vegas would surely be a bumper harvest... While Paddock and his agency superiors set the trap as neatly as he would fill an accounting ledger, the ISIS gunmen quietly took their stations at the Bellagio, Caesar’s Palace, the Aria, New York New York, Tropicana and the Mandalay Bay..." (part 1)

"How can anyone be so certain about professional military involvement? When information from the Las Vegas police radio scanner is superimposed on a map of The Strip, it discloses that the triangle of fire from machine-guns at the Tropicana/Hooters and New York New York hotels passed through narrow spaces between structures onto the concert venue over a distance of more than 300 meters..." (part 2)

"This essay...explores the centrality of Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s fiefdom in the Commonwealth of Virginia to the military contractor role of the fall guy Stephen Paddock, along with the governor’s support for federalization of the state National Guards... Attempts to probe the background to the ownership of the Cirrus SR20 aircraft, registered under the name of Stephen Paddock for covert ops, have met with obfuscation..." (part 3)

-- Yoichi Shimatsu series: part 1, part 2, part 3

Interesting speculation, but not conclusive. Why would the Feds set up such an operation on the 32nd floor of a crowded luxury hotel? Why thousands of rounds of ammo just to sell a few "marked guns"? Why didn't the clients simply kill "agent Paddock" quietly and then disappear into the crowd? Where is the physical evidence of "machine-guns" firing at ground level? The so-called ISIS / al Queda terrorist group has been funded, trained and protected by US government agencies since its inception. The story doesn't hold up.

So, the questions remain unanswered. What was the actual target of this whole operation? Who really carried out the attack? Who benefits from tagging "ISIS" as the perpetrators? Why was this "harvest sacrifice" staged directly in front of the Luxor pyramid and obelisk of Osiris?

UPDATE: The hotel security guard mysteriously vanished from public view just before a scheduled press conference where he might have faced some embarrasing questions. It seems that his handlers needed more time to polish up his "story" for maximum emotional effect with minimal factual content. The alleged "hero" showed up again a few days later in a carefully scripted appearance on an NBC talk show favored by LGBTQ socialists. No serious questions were asked, and it was declared that he would give no further interviews. How convenient.

* See our previous comments on the Orlando Pulse nightclub event last year.

James Tracy Ph.D., a professor of Media Studies who was fired for actively questioning the official story of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting event, has recently posted an article reviewing some of the anomalies:

"The evidence [presented] demonstrates that (1) proof of death was suppressed, (2) emergency protocols were not followed, (3) drill protocols were followed instead, (4) there was foreknowledge of the event, (5) there was confusion over the weapons supposedly used, (6) Adam Lanza cannot possibly have carried out the shooting as claimed, (7) strange and inappropriate behavior was displayed by officials, witnesses, and relatives, (8) many odd photos of the participants and premises were released, (9) the crime scene was destroyed under conditions of secrecy."

-- Vivian Lee article

"On December 14, 2012 the Sandy Hook massacre event was reported as fact by US news media, even though it remains difficult to ascertain what actually took place on that day. For weeks after the event the nation and world were terrorized by around-the-clock coverage and discussion of the narrative. At the same time powerful interests behind the multitude of gun control change agents, which included the families directly involved in the Sandy Hook event, capitalized on this fear. As a result of these efforts SHP and other ostensibly “non-profit” organizations have reaped tens of millions [of dollars]."

-- James Tracy article

Whether or not you agree with the author's conclusions, the questions remain. Why are the site photos consistent with an emergency responder exercise rather than an actual shooting? Why no photos of a mass evacuation? Why were normal protocols not followed? Why were the alleged shooting victims left inside the school? Who pronounced all of them dead at the scene? Why were public records concealed? Where are the autopsy reports? Why was evidence at the "crime scene" sealed then destroyed without proper investigation?

Watch the press conference with Dr. Wayne Carver, the "chief medical examiner" who allegedly conducted autopsies on the murdered children. Flanked by state troopers, he seems very nervous and evasive, providing no answers to specific questions about what happened. What was he afraid of?

If there is even one deception in the official narrative, then the entire event is open to question. For example, watch the video clip of "Robbie Parker" getting ready for his CNN television interview (starts at 3:00). Does this really look like a grieving father who just lost his daughter in a gruesome murder? Or does it look more like this?

"In method acting, performers try to duplicate real life emotional experiences and conditions in an effort to recreate a life-like, realistic performance. Method actors draw or borrow from their own emotions, experiences and memories influencing their characters portrayal. When applying proper deep breathing exercises while practicing your method technique it can help you focus, relax and concentrate, resulting in a powerful emotional output."

-- "Method Acting and Proper Breathing"

Also see the melodramatic performances by Gene Rosen, a psychologist and amateur thespian, who allegedly helped "shelter" some children from the school. His acting may be good enough for the Newtown community theatre, but why does his story keep changing? Why didn't he call the police immediately?

The official Sandy Hook story is inaccurate and incomplete. Media reports designed for "powerful emotional output" replaced factual investigation, like this tear-jerker by CFR member Diane Sawyer of ABC News. Politicians then used the manufactured fear to advance the establishment agenda: increase surveillance, lock down the schools, disarm the public, implement "mental health" screening, etc.

Barack Obama, who shed a few crocodile tears for the occasion, is a hypocrite who boasts of murdering "terrorists" -- anybody he chooses, for any reason, without evidence or due process -- using paid mercenaries and remote controlled drones. Liberal war hawk Hillary Clinton, the darling of Brookings and the CFR, was right beside him, helping to pull the trigger and lusting for "her turn". Those drones are now being employed by militarized U.S. police departments. Which is the real threat to Americans?

For more evidence of deception at Sandy Hook, see the Media Solidarity Group video and the online book "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" (400 pages, many photos). Check the facts, then decide for yourself.

In Orlando, Florida soon after the annual "Gay Days" event, gunman Omar Mateen allegedly shot and killed several people at the "Pulse" homosexual nightclub. Media reports claimed that the shooter was an "anti-gay Islamic terrorist" acting alone, and they lied about the type of weapon used in the attack. Several witnesses have now testified that Mateen was actually a regular patron of the club, who liked to drink liquor and cruise "gay" hookup sites on the internet. It seems that he was neither anti-gay nor pro-Islamic, just the opposite.

"Omar Mateen, the gunman who murdered 49 people in an Orlando gay club early Sunday morning, was a gay [homosexual] man himself according to multiple people who knew and had met the man. A gay man who attended the police academy in 2006 with Mateen said that the pair went out to gay bars and that at one point Mateen told the man he wanted to pursue a relationship. Meanwhile, multiple people are now coming forward to say that they had spoken with Mateen on gay hookup apps including Grindr and Jack'd."

-- Daily Mail (see photos)

Mateen, who also liked to beat his former wife, was a registered Democrat and an employee of the G4S global security firm, trained in the use of firearms and public abuse. His father, Seddique Mateen, is a U.S. sponsored Afghan activist who recently met with officials in Washington.

Of course, the President immediately called for more gun control. After all, wouldn't America (and the rest of the world) be a safer place if all homosexual Democrat narcisscists who like to take pictures of themselves were disarmed? But what about the victims in the club, who were already disarmed? How would they defend themselves from being beaten to death by their sex partners? How would that prevent firebomb attacks?

Please watch the last few seconds of this short video clip, showing a group of guys carrying an alleged "shooting victim" wearing red shoes down the sidewalk. When they reach the sign that says "Fix It Here", they set the guy down on his feet, and the whole group relaxes -- just like a bunch of crisis actors after a successful "take". Note that only the first part of this "news report" was actually broadcast -- the last few seconds were edited out of what was shown to the public. Here's a Bitchute archive of other video clips about the event.

The founder of the "Pulse" nightclub, where Mateen chose to act out his fantasies, used to go to such "loving spaces" at age 14 along with her homosexual brother who later died of sexually transmitted disease, as this nauseating puff piece in the liberal Washington Post describes it:

"As teens in the beachside town of Fort Lauderdale, nestled along Florida’s southeastern coast, John introduced her, at age 14, to his mysterious, dynamic world; a vibrant, sexy, underground realm that came alive overnight in bars and clubs. There, with John at her side, Barbara learned how to 'party' — and love unconditionally — inside these spaces that were safe for all... Like the places where John first introduced her to his community’s colorful life, her club would embody that energy. It would have decor to make John proud and 'an atmosphere that embraced the gay lifestyle'...

-- Washington Post

Since when was it acceptable in America to lure a 14 year old girl into such "vibrant, sexy" places to "party" with adult perverts? How is that morally different from Jeffrey Epstein's private island? Since when did the owners of the national media begin to promote such degeneracy instead of condemning it? Why should decent Americans give up their firearms just to satisfy such people?

It seems that America is in the late stages of its 'Weimar Republic' period, both economically and culturally, led by the same ideological forces. If the pattern holds, there will be an eventual backlash against the corruption and decadence, along with the rise of a totalitarian regime which promises to sweep it all away. The infrastructure needed to bypass representative government and enforce martial law is already in place; all that remains is a suitable trigger event.

“Berlin nightlife, my word, the world hasn’t seen anything like it!” Klaus Mann, son of the great German author Thomas Mann, enthused sardonically. “We used to have a first-class army. Now we have first class perversions.”... German Jewish author Stephan Zweig has much to say about homosexuality, pointing out that even in Ancient Rome...the degree of drunken depravity and public shamelessness was far less shocking than in Weimar Berlin: "Even the Rome of Suetonius had never known such orgies as the pervert balls of Berlin, where hundreds of men costumed as women and hundreds of women dressed as men danced under the benevolent eyes of the police. In the collapse of all values a kind of madness gained hold. Young girls bragged proudly of their perversion; to be sixteen [or fourteen, as above] and still under suspicion of virginity would have been a disgrace.”

-- "The Sexual Decadence of Weimar Germany", Lasha Darkmoon (2013)

The brief Weimar Republic period in Germany was dominated by Jewish socialists. The "collapse of all values" described above coincided with economic turmoil, hyperinflation and mass unemployment -- paving the way for the rise of Hitler.

"Joshua Goldberg, a 20-year old [Jew] living at his parents' house in Orange Park, Florida, is accused of posing online as "Australi Witness," a Daesh supporter who publicly called for a series of attacks against individuals and events in western countries. In recent days "Australi Witness" [Goldberg] has claimed online that he is working with 'other jihadists' to plan attacks in Australia and the United States. He distributed pictures of a 'bomb' that he was working on...

The Australi Witness persona [Goldberg] fooled members of the international intelligence community as well as journalists, with well-known analyst Rita Katz of SITE Intelligence Group saying the "IS supporter" held a "prestige" position in online jihadi circles and was "part of the hard core of a group of individuals who constantly look for targets for other people to attack".

-- Sydney Morning Herald

Zionist propagandist Rita Katz is not an "analyst" who was "fooled" by this young Jewish actor, as the writer would have us believe. On the contrary, it appears that SITE played a key role in generating credibility and publicity for the performance, and should be charged as an accessory to international terrorism.

This story is very similar to the case of Adam (Pearlman) Gadahn, another fake "Islamic terrorist" who was heavily promoted by Katz and her SITE operation. He was eventually exposed as the grandson of a prominent Jewish ADL director as reported earlier. For over a decade, SITE has been the primary distributor of dodgy terrorist videos, scripted and produced to generate fear and manipulate public perception. How is that possible? Who benefits?

UPDATE: Here's an amusing expose of "The Amazing Rita Katz" and her uncanny ability to get the scoop.

Shortly after the attack on the Charlie Hebdo office in Paris (see below) while the suspects were still at large, a nearby Jewish market was also attacked by their alleged associate, a radical black Muslim named Amedy Coulibaly, who held the employees and customers as hostages. After a brief standoff, the gunman and four of the hostages were allegedly killed when French police stormed the building. His French girlfriend and accomplice somehow managed to escape. This entire "cell" had been known to police for years. Why were they allowed to continue?

The notorious, pro-Zionist SITE Intelligence Group has posted a video which allegedly shows Coulibaly calmly making his statement about these events. It features all of the usual props, including the "caliphate" flag, the white robes, and an AK-47 propped up against the wall. The video has also been posted by "Foreign Policy", now owned by the Washington Post. However, there has been no official verification of the video or its source.

Immediately after this despicable event, several European leaders including Hollande, Merkel, and Cameron interrupted their busy schedules to take part in a made-for-TV publicity stunt, marching in support of "liberal" values, humanist porn, solidarity with Jews, etc. It's amazing how they managed to organize the event so quickly, and to boldly lead the parade down the street despite the alleged "terrorist threat". How did they know other attackers were not ready and waiting to kill hundereds more? Compare this wide-angle shot with this televised closeup to see how it was staged.

Prime minister Bibi "the Butcher" Netanyahu of Israel was among the dignitaires posing for the cameras, and in typical Jewish theatrical style he managed to upstage them all:

"The Israeli prime minister was seen elbowing his way to the front of the parade of world leaders, and unsuccessfully tried to jump to the head of queue waiting for a bus that was to take guests to the starting point... The alleged gaffes were further compounded by reports that the Israeli leader attended the event in defiance of a request to stay away from Francois Hollande, the French president... The most serious criticism has been levelled at his call for members of France's Jewish community – the largest in Europe – to move to Israel for safety reasons following last Friday's attack on a kosher supermarket in Paris, in which four Jews were killed... That is said to have offended Mr Hollande, who attended a rally at Paris' grand synagogue on Sunday night with Mr Netanyahu but pointedly left before the Israeli leader addressed the audience."

-- London Telegraph

"The attack sparked calls from Israeli leaders for French Jews to immigrate to the Jewish State... "I believe that they know deep in their hearts that they have [only] one country, the state of Israel, that is their historic homeland [sic] and will always welcome them with open arms," Netanyahu said. "Today, more than ever, Israel is the true home for all of us."... Instead of being buried in France, the victims' bodies were flown to Israel, where they received a funeral with many of the trappings of an official ceremony."

-- Associated Press

"On the day of the memorial service for those slain in the kosher supermarket attack, Prime Minister Manuel Valls of France sought to take his seat in the synagogue with the President, Francois Hollande, and Israel’s leader, Bibi Netanyahu. As he approached his seat, his path was blocked by an [Israeli] Shin Bet agent who refused to allow him to pass until Netanyahu had taken his own seat. According to Valls, the agent grabbed his arm and forced him to wait until the Israeli had seated himself. Valls shouted at him in French and English: "You don’t make the rules here! You provide security for the prime minister of Israel, that is all!"

-- Richard Silverstein article

Compare this hypocritical posturing over 4 (four) dead Jews, while the "world community" and the corporate media turn a blind eye toward the coldly calculated massacre of over 2000 non-Jews, including hundreds of children, at the hands of the Zionists and their contrived Jewish State only a few short months ago. Were any of these gruesome images shown on TV? Of course not. The double standard of the media and the knee-jerk response of the Western political "leaders" reveals the hidden hand of their financial masters, who are moving the nations rapidly towards an economic collapse and a third world war.

UPDATE: Here's a commentary on this fiasco from a liberal Jewish perspective:

"Not only did [the publicity] prove that terrorism is effective, not only did it invite copycat attacks, but it also hurt the real fight against the fanatics... Much easier for politicians to march in the street in front of the cameras. And who marched in the first row, beaming like a victor? Our own and only Bibi [Netanyahu]... Placed in the second row, he did what Israelis do: he shoved aside a black African president in front of him and placed himself in the front row. Once there, he began waving to the people on the balconies along the way. He was beaming, like a Roman general in his triumphal parade...

The blood of the four Jews murdered in the kosher supermarket was not yet dry, when Israeli leaders called upon all the Jews in France to pack up and come to Israel... The next day Israeli papers reported joyfully that in 2015 more than 10,000 French Jews were about to come to live here, driven by growing anti-Semitism... What we see now is the continuation of this war between Algerian Muslims and Jews on French soil. All the four "French" Jews killed in the attack had North African names and were buried in Israel [after] the Israeli government put great pressure on the four families..."

-- Uri Avnery, Gush Shalom, Israel

"The Jewish community of Algeria, which once constituted 2% of the total population, has substantially decreased due to emigration, mostly to France and Israel." -- Wikipedia

UPDATE: The surviving staff of the Charlie Hebdo magazine, amazingly unaffected by their traumatic experience, released a new edition shortly after the incident. Predictably, it featured a cartoon once again mocking the prophet of Islam on its cover. Millions of copies of this sarcastic insult, pouring gasoline on the fire, were printed and distributed by the French newspaper "Liberation" -- which has been owned and controlled by Jewish financier Edouard de Rothschild since 2005.

It was reported that the Paris office of the rude and provocative political magazine "Charlie Hebdo" was attacked by a pair of Muslim gunmen who killed the editor, Stephane Charbonnier ("Charb"), and several other staff members who had repeatedly mocked and insulted their religious beliefs for years. There is no justification for such violence in a civilized society. However, as one writer points out, they literally asked for it and even specified the timeframe:

"The folks at Charlie Hebdo had it coming... I would even argue that this is how Charlie Hebdo made it's money, daring the "Muslim train" to run them over. You think I am exaggerating? Check out the caricature (image here) which one of the folks [Charb] who got murdered yesterday had just posted. The text reads: "Still no terrorist attacks in France -- 'Wait!, we have until the end of January to send you our best wishes!'". The crazy person shown in the drawing is packing a Kalashnikov rifle and wearing an Afghan "Pakol" -- the typical "crazy Muslim" in Charlie Hebdo's world. Talk about a stupid dare...[premonition? self-fulfilling prophecy?]

The fact is that the Anglo-Zionists [and their NATO partners] have carefully and lovingly nurtured, organized, armed, financed, trained, equipped and even directed the Takfiri crazies for decades... Apparently, nobody cares about their victims in Afghanistan, in Bosnia, in Chechnia, in Kosovo, in Libya, in Kurdistan, in Iraq or elsewhere... So no, I am most definitely NOT Charlie this morning and I am disgusted beyond words with the obscene display of sanctimonius "solidarity" for a group of "caviar-lefties" who made their money spitting in the souls of billions of people and then dared them to do something about it."

-- The Saker

Where were all these humanist "champions of free speech" and their feckless leaders during the latest slaughter in Palestine committed by the Jewish Zionists, who murdered more than 2000 non-Jews and left thousands more maimed, orphaned and homeless? Those atrocities are also the product of religious extremism, and equally reprehensible. Yet the silence is deafening.

Christians and Muslims were both frequent targets for the crude disrepect dished out by the pornographers at Charlie Hebdo. Here's another sample of the offensive crap that the "irresponsible journal" routinely published, this time showing the "holy trinity" sodomizing each other. Very funny. Fortunately for them, the Catholics stopped burning people at the stake for blasphemy a couple of centuries ago. Apparently, some Muslims decided it was better to go down fighting rather than lay down and take it any longer -- if we believe the story.

"Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." -- Galatians 6:7

"Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men... And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him... But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned." -- Matthew 12:31-37

On the other hand, should we really believe the story? Are there other players with other motives?

According to the London Guardian, police claimed the "professional" gunmen "clearly knew their target in advance” and "went straight to the conference room", yet witnesses said they didn't know the code for the front door and couldn't even find the right office. After forcing their way into the building, the gunmen ran around inside for at least 10 minutes with rifles in hand before the shooting started. A woman let them into the building, but they didn't silence her? Nobody called upstairs to warn the Charlie Hebdo staff? Nobody pulled the fire alarm or did anything to stop them?

It was also reported that a French policeman was "shot in the head" at point-blank range by the gunmen as they made their retreat. Oddly enough, video footage of the incident does not show any of the gruesome effects one might expect from an AK-47 (head exploding, violent reaction, blood everywhere), just a puff of dust from the pavement near the guy's head. Very strange, almost theatrical. Why was the street deserted? How was a camera perfectly placed to record the action?

A couple of days later, after the police found a conveniently "misplaced" ID card in the abandoned getaway car, the two named "suspects" were surrounded and blown away in a hail of gunfire, ensuring that there would be no embarrassing trial or media coverage that might contradict the official version of events. Where is the evidence that the masked "professionals" who carried out the attack were the same as these amateurs who were so quickly trapped and killed by police? As with similar cases (Boston bombing, London bombing, etc), the true story may never be revealed.

UPDATE: See this in-depth discussion on the provocative role of Charlie Hebdo:

"Charlie Hebdo served as a mouthpiece for the ideology of the world system in a convergence of Grand Orient politicized Freemasonry, economic liberalism, Jacobinism, Zionism, and Marxism... While pontificating about “free speech”, criticism of Israel was not tolerated, and any manifestation of the Nationalist Right was regarded as requiring state repression. Charlie Hebdo advocates the “liberalism” of the Jacobins, the argument of the guillotine, figuratively, if not literally."

-- Kerry Bolton article

Yesterday, a young black woman with a toddler in the back seat of her car drove up to a security barrier near the White House, where she was accosted by Obama's Praetorian guard. Apparently confused, she backed away and left the scene, only to be boxed in a few blocks away by the Capitol police who surrounded her with their weapons drawn. She then fled in panic from the gunmen, who chased her down the street before finally shooting her dead (see photos).

The Capitol building was also briefly locked down, interrupting the important work of closing the National Parks and increasing the national debt. After the event, these spineless lizards gave the "combat heroes" a standing ovation for bravely gunning down the unarmed dental hygienist, Miriam Carey.

The corporate media quickly fabricated a cover story, presenting the woman as an "armed terrorist" who had "rammed the barricade" with her car despite the fact that she was unarmed, and the photo of her car shows no frontal impact damage. It was also reported that she "nearly" hit some of the officers in her attempt to escape, but since when is that a justification for murder?

She is now being described as a "depressed single mother" who had recently lost her job and was taking prescription drugs which are known to produce erratic behavior. Perhaps she should be remembered as the first welfare mom to be treated under the new Obamacare program.

UPDATE: New information about the murder of Ms. Carey has now been obtained by the family attorney:

"First they called her a terrorist threat. When she turned out to be an unarmed suburban mother, they said she was on drugs. Now, WND has exclusively learned, without a trace of doubt, that was wrong, too... The official police investigation still has not been released, but Carey family attorney Eric Sanders obtained the toxicology and autopsy report... [showing that] Miriam Carey was shot in the back of the head by U.S. Capitol Police officers and uniformed Secret Service agents six months ago, on Oct. 3, 2013. "

-- World Net Daily article

There has been much speculation about what really happened at the Boston Marathon attack in mid-April. The photo evidence clearly contradicts much of what has been reported by the media, as shown by the articles below. Why is that? Check the facts, then draw your own conclusions.

"The mainstream media story of the Boston Marathon bombing is of Chechen terrorists who unleashed weapons of mass destruction, killing four and wounding 264 in an unthinkable scene of "bodies flying into the street", "so many people without legs" and "blood everywhere." A massive police response followed, with 9,000 federal, state, FBI and Department of Homeland Security troops conducting door-to-door searches...

[However,] based on the video and photo record, it seems clear that the lead actor in this production -- the most grievously wounded as well as the man who fingered Dzhokhar Tsarnaev as the bomber -- was faking his injuries... Based on real time video evidence, this picture (view photo) was taken more than six and a half minutes after his calves [and feet] were blown off. He is not bleeding, he is sitting up with eyes open, and he is still a long way from getting medical attention...

Immediately after the bombing...far from being splayed out on the concrete in a pool of blood, clothes tattered and/or singed from the heat, struggling to comprehend what has just happened, and with multiple smaller injuries in addition to those that took off his legs, we see an odd scene. Miracle Man is on his back...[but] we see no blood, injuries or torn clothing on him or anyone else in the photo. Miracle Man's thighs, hands and elbows are in the air and a hooded man is [over him]...

A few minutes later, we see this odd scene (view photo). Miracle Man isn't visible, although we know he hasn't left the area yet, because Carlos, his [soon-to-be] rescuer, is still there, leaning against the fence holding his cowboy hat and flag, as if waiting his cue. The hooded man is now reclining, propped up on one arm, looking very relaxed..."

-- Sheila Casey article, with photos

If the explosion had been strong enough to tear this man's legs off, then how come no one else around him was seriously injured? Why are the others in the photo just standing around or strolling normally instead of running for their lives? How do they know there isn't another bomb nearby ready to go off? For comparison, here is a recent report by the Royal Society regarding injuries from a "pressure cooker" style bomb, including this gruesome photo of what a "typical IED blast lower limb injury with high above-knee amputations" really looks like (viewer caution advised).

Dr. Stan Monteith, an orthopedic surgeon with over 30 years of experience, observed that "something was wrong" with the story when he saw the man sitting up in a wheelchair:

"I know that they're lying to us because of a picture that I saw on that very first day. It was a devastating picture [of] a fellow that had both legs blown off. A young man sitting in a wheelchair, being wheeled by a gentleman who had a cowboy hat on... But why would they take somebody who had just had both legs blown off and put him into a wheelchair? He would have been in profound shock. And why weren't the tourniquets on both legs, clamping off the blood supply? And when I saw that, I knew something was wrong... I was a trauma surgeon for many years, I was an orthopedic surgeon. And basically, I looked at that below knee amputation on the left side, and it [appeared to be] a well-healed below knee amputation stump...there was no tear in the skin, no blood, no nothing at all -- just a bloody tibia sticking out of the end -- and it looked like it had been attached to this stump...

And then, 19 days after losing both legs, he was [already] out of the rehab hospital. How could that happen? It takes a long time after you've lost both legs, you know, to get prostheses fitted, to get strong enough, and get the strength in your arms. But 19 days after the attack there in Boston, why this young man, Jeff Bauman, went to the Boston Bruins hockey game...and you can see pictures of him -- he's waving a flag, and he has two above knee amputations. Above knee amputations? Now wait a minute, the Jeff Bauman we saw initially had a below knee amputation and this is an above knee amputation... I've tried to call the Spaulding Rehab Center on three occasions...and we never get a call back... The last thing they want is for the media to know that this whole picture, this picture that was implanted in our minds...about Jeff Bauman who lost both legs there, this is all fraudulent. And if that is fraudulent, then what else is fraudulent?"

-- Radio Liberty transcript

Bauman has since made several public appearances, including a Bruins hockey game, a Red Sox baseball game (with cowboy Carlos), and a recent visit with his former co-workers at Costco. If the official story is a fabrication -- as the bomb scene photos suggest -- then how, when and why were his legs amputated?

For an in-depth analysis of the Boston event based on the available photo evidence of the scene, author Dave McGowan has published a multi-part series showing the inconsistencies with the published news reports:

"We can clearly see that the hooded guy, mere moments after the blast, is primarily concerned with donning his sunglasses... He will remain in the hoody and shades for as long as he is on the set, even while receiving medical attention. We can also see more clearly here that Redcoat, Nicole, and hoody guy are all within inches of Jeff, with his freshly amputated limbs pointed directly at them... All three accomplices, nevertheless, will emerge from their ordeal without so much as a drop of Johnny's [sic] blood on them. Also, none of the three appear to have received any significant injuries despite having been right alongside a guy who supposedly got both his legs blown off...

Below is a close-up of hoody guy, cropped from the same high-resolution image. Hoody is clearly knocking on death's door here and we can bear witness to his exposed femurs, shredded and badly bleeding legs, and partially 'degloved' right hand [as reported]... Actually we can't see any of that because none of it really happened. What we actually see is a guy comfortably reclining with a fully intact right hand and two perfectly fine legs." (part 1)

"Everyone who has had a microphone stuck in their face has, virtually without exception, lied about what they saw, what they experienced and what they did. And these have not been random lies, but rather lies specifically crafted to describe a scene far more horrifying that what actually existed - bodies piled up in bloody heaps, disembodied legs littering the scene, the stench of burning flesh, bodies being pulled out from beneath the rubble of buildings, gushing wounds spurting blood everywhere, etc. Not one of these people can point to a single photograph that actually depicts what they claim to have witnessed." (part 6)

"What we appear to be seeing here is a campaign aimed at erasing the line between reality and fantasy - between what is objectively real and what is make-believe. For many years now we have seen a blurring of the line between news and entertainment, as well as, through 'reality' television, a blurring of the line between what is 'real' and what is scripted. We are now entering an age when there will be no dividing line at all between news, scripted entertainment and 'reality' TV. It will all be one and the same. In the new 'reality' we will be living in, nothing will be real and everything will be true." (part 7)

-- Dave McGowan series, with photos

Here's another interesting angle on this increasingly preposterous event. It seems that the uncle of the alleged "terrorists", who was interviewed on TV soon after Bauman fingered Tsarnaev as the perpetrator, was the son-in-law of a top CIA official. Imagine that.

"The uncle of the two suspected Boston bombers...Ruslan Tsarni, was married to the daughter of former top CIA official Graham Fuller. The discovery that Uncle Ruslan Tsarni had spy connections that go far deeper than had been previously known is ironic, especially since the mainstrean media's focus yesterday was on a feverish search to find who might have recruited the Tsarnaev brothers..."

"[Ruslan Tsarni had] incorporated, in 1995, a company called the Congress of Chechen International Organizations [and was] listed as the company's resident agent... Even as the company was sending aid to Islamic terrorists in Chechnya, its listed address was in the home of former top CIA official Graham Fuller...the one-time Vice-Chairman of the National Intelligence Council at the CIA under President Reagan... [Fuller] admitted that Ruslan Tsarni had once been married to his daughter."

-- Daniel Hopsicker articles

"Aaron Greene and [his] girlfriend Morgan Gliedman..., the well-to-do [Jewish] heroin addicts who were arrested for allegedly keeping explosives in their Greenwich Village apartment, were reportedly planning to blow up the arch in nearby Washington Square Park... Inside the apartment, officers found seven grams of the explosive powder HMTD, which was reportedly the substance used in the 2005 London Underground bombings. The building had to be evacuated while the bomb squad removed the highly-unstable explosive... Several disturbing items were seized, including: 'The Terrorist's Encyclopedia'...and U.S. Army manuals for creating and planting booby traps and explosives.

Following the arrest, it emerged that [Gliedman] was already a suspect in a robbery, and already on probation for drug possession... On February 17 [2012], Gliedman met a man at Johnny's Bar in the Village and went to his Midtown apartment where she allegedly 'took off' with a backpack containing his laptop, cellphone, wallet and credit cards, which she used to make purchases. Five days after the robbery...she and her Harvard-graduate boyfriend, Greene, were arrested for possession of drugs and found with a .223-caliber rifle."

-- London Daily Mail

In typical fashion, the media reports on this story fail to mention that these serial criminals and would-be "terrorists" are Jews.

According to NYC subway propagandist Pamela Geller, only the Muslims are violent savages. I wonder if the cops found any Arab costumes in the closet along with the "explosive powder"?

There has been another tragic mass shooting in a "gun-free zone" committed by another spoiled loser on psychotropic drugs, followed by the predictable hysteria and cries from the elitist anti-gun crowd (led by Feinstein, Schumer, Lieberman, Lautenberg, Bloomberg, et al) to strip law abiding citizens of their weapons.

To breakup this recurring pattern, we should start by banning the use of psychotropic drugs on children. We should restore discipline, moral values, and high standards in the schools. We should restrict the violent programming spewed out by the Hollywood studios. We should keep the mentally disturbed off the streets. But don't hold your breath waiting for the Jewish liberals to address any of those issues.

Feinstein, a wealthy hypocrite who packs a pistol in her purse for her own self-defense, thinks that the commoners should just trust the government instead. That policy was a failure in Russia, comrade Feinstein, and it won't work here either. The Bolsheviks confiscated the weapons, then proceeded to exterminate 60 million disarmed citizens who didn't go along with their program. Is that what you and your friends really want?

Every law-abiding adult should be trained in the use of firearms, and encouraged to carry a weapon for defense of the community, just as the American Founders envisioned. Even ONE armed adult at the school might have prevented this tragedy; why not half a dozen? Any psychopath who picks up a gun, or a knife, or a baseball bat and enters any public place with intent to harm others needs to know that he will be met with deadly force and stopped.

"When seconds count, the police are only minutes away" as Ms. Feinstein obviously knows. The government employees show up to count the bodies and fill out the paperwork, if they show up at all.

"Just recently, the city attorney of San Bernardino, California told citizens to "lock their doors and load their guns" because there is not enough money to pay for 'adequate' police protection any longer. The murder rate in San Bernardino is up 50 percent this year, but the city is dealing with bankruptcy and has been forced to lay off 80 police officers... In Oakland, burglaries are up 43 percent so far this year [and] more than 11,000 homes, cars or businesses have been broken into... [In Chicago,] there are only about 200 police officers assigned...to handle the estimated 100,000 gang members living in the city."

-- Economic Collapse Blog

In every major U.S. city, gang members are allowed to roam the streets preying on any easy target they can find. There were over 500 murders and 2500 shootings in Chicago alone this year, with similar percentages in Detroit and Oakland. They all voted for Obama and his friends, including Rahm Emanuel, who give them free food, free housing, free education, free health care, and free cell phones -- at taxpayer expense. Now they want to make sure nobody can shoot back.

Then we see Mr. "Peace Prize" Obama, the warmonger of Afghanistan and Libya, crying his crocodile tears on the TV, making political hay out of a local tragedy. What a contemptible performance. How many thousands have been killed by his drone attacks and his mercenaries over the past 4 years? And how many killed in Gaza with weapons provided by Obama and the Jewish liberals? Where are the tears for those victims? Hypocrites! Liars! Murderers!